# Anyone else having issues with property bindings after 7.9.9?

**URL:** <https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/anyone-else-having-issues-with-property-bindings-after-7-9-9/19865>\
**Category:** Ignition\
**Tags:** ignition79\
**Created:** [September 27, 2018, 5:53pm UTC](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/anyone-else-having-issues-with-property-bindings-after-7-9-9/19865 "2018-09-27T17:53:43Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SeraSera](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ad7895/32.png) [@SeraSera](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/u/SeraSera)\
**Post date:** [September 27, 2018, 5:53pm UTC](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/anyone-else-having-issues-with-property-bindings-after-7-9-9/19865/1 "2018-09-27T17:53:43Z")

</div>

Looks like after our upgrade to 7.9.9, property bindings on a window’s root container don’t evaluate consistently (If at all).

Static properties that never change won’t get passed on to components,but will evaluate if they are modified.  
For example a string like ‘tagPath/tag’ changed to ‘tagPath/tag\_’ and then reverted to ‘tagPath/tag’ will trigger a propagation to other components bound to that property directly.

Is this ringing a bell for anyone?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![paul-griffith](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/inductiveautomation/user_avatar/forum.inductiveautomation.com/paul-griffith/32/37249_2.png) [@paul-griffith](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/u/paul-griffith)\
**Post date:** [September 27, 2018, 6:06pm UTC](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/anyone-else-having-issues-with-property-bindings-after-7-9-9/19865/2 "2018-09-27T18:06:25Z")

</div>

I’m not aware of any issues with bindings in 7.9.9 - this is fairly concerning. Could you open a support ticket, so they can see what’s going on with your system and either replicate it or see what’s going wrong?
