# \[BUG - 15076\] Module Licensing

**URL:** <https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/bug-15076-module-licensing/28527>\
**Category:** Module Development\
**Created:** [September 24, 2019, 8:33pm UTC](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/bug-15076-module-licensing/28527 "2019-09-24T20:33:29Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 7\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kyle\_Chase](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/9de0a6/32.png) [@Kyle\_Chase](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/u/Kyle_Chase)\
**Post date:** [September 24, 2019, 8:33pm UTC](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/bug-15076-module-licensing/28527/1 "2019-09-24T20:33:29Z")

</div>

We are having with licensing out modules since secondary license keys became a thing. If we register a key once the module is running, we do not get notified of a license change. The module only sees the license being valid after a module restart. The inverse is true as well. We registered the LicenseStateUpdateListener to no avail. Can someone provide some insight please?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Michael.Stofan](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/inductiveautomation/user_avatar/forum.inductiveautomation.com/michael.stofan/32/3342_2.png) [@Michael.Stofan](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/u/Michael.Stofan)\
**Post date:** [September 26, 2019, 4:08pm UTC](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/bug-15076-module-licensing/28527/2 "2019-09-26T16:08:24Z")

</div>

Hey Kyle. This might be a bug in our secondary licensing stuff. We’ve opened a ticket and are looking into it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kyle\_Chase](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/9de0a6/32.png) [@Kyle\_Chase](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/u/Kyle_Chase)\
**Post date:** [September 26, 2019, 4:13pm UTC](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/bug-15076-module-licensing/28527/3 "2019-09-26T16:13:21Z")

</div>

Awesome, thanks Mike. If there is a work around for current and previous versions before the fix, that would be great to know as well.

Kyle

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![awalker](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/inductiveautomation/user_avatar/forum.inductiveautomation.com/awalker/32/6874_2.png) [@awalker](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/u/awalker)\
**Post date:** [October 28, 2019, 5:58pm UTC](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/bug-15076-module-licensing/28527/4 "2019-10-28T17:58:30Z")

</div>

This issue was fixed in the 8.0.6 nightly build that was uploaded today (10/28)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kyle\_Chase](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/9de0a6/32.png) [@Kyle\_Chase](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/u/Kyle_Chase)\
**Post date:** [October 28, 2019, 6:13pm UTC](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/bug-15076-module-licensing/28527/5 "2019-10-28T18:13:29Z")

</div>

This issue exists in 7.9.x as well, will it be fixed in 7.9.13?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![paul-griffith](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/inductiveautomation/user_avatar/forum.inductiveautomation.com/paul-griffith/32/37249_2.png) [@paul-griffith](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/u/paul-griffith)\
**Post date:** [October 28, 2019, 6:16pm UTC](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/bug-15076-module-licensing/28527/6 "2019-10-28T18:16:42Z")

</div>

Yes, it already has been backported to the 7.9 codebase as well.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kyle\_Chase](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/9de0a6/32.png) [@Kyle\_Chase](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/u/Kyle_Chase)\
**Post date:** [October 28, 2019, 6:17pm UTC](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/bug-15076-module-licensing/28527/7 "2019-10-28T18:17:14Z")

</div>

Awesome, thanks.