# \[bug\] viewParams for Perspective Embedding objects do not pass updates when key is a number

**URL:** <https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/bug-viewparams-for-perspective-embedding-objects-do-not-pass-updates-when-key-is-a-number/50402>\
**Category:** Ignition\
**Tags:** perspective, ignition81\
**Created:** [August 28, 2021, 2:34am UTC](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/bug-viewparams-for-perspective-embedding-objects-do-not-pass-updates-when-key-is-a-number/50402 "2021-08-28T02:34:07Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![321liftoff](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/inductiveautomation/user_avatar/forum.inductiveautomation.com/321liftoff/32/27544_2.png) [@321liftoff](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/u/321liftoff)\
**Post date:** [August 28, 2021, 2:34am UTC](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/bug-viewparams-for-perspective-embedding-objects-do-not-pass-updates-when-key-is-a-number/50402/2 "2021-08-28T02:34:43Z")

</div>

@paul-griffith I don't know if this is somewhat related to this forum post:

> [@\[bug?\] Invalid key on object binding](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/bug-invalid-key-on-object-binding/45763/11):
>
> I think it’s mostly just the json tree being overzealous with the warning, actually. From what I can tell, the type is preserved as a string pretty well throughout. If you don’t care about the warnings in the editor, it’s probably reasonably safe to ignore…although I would still consider if there’s a different way to do things. For instance, I set up a simple transform to return a dictionary with numeric strings as keys, and tested the type:

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/bug-viewparams-for-perspective-embedding-objects-do-not-pass-updates-when-key-is-a-number/50402)._