# Document format vs dataset performance for tag history binding

**URL:** <https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/document-format-vs-dataset-performance-for-tag-history-binding/36101>\
**Category:** Ignition Early Access\
**Created:** [June 26, 2020, 5:15pm UTC](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/document-format-vs-dataset-performance-for-tag-history-binding/36101 "2020-06-26T17:15:47Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![nader.chinichian](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/inductiveautomation/user_avatar/forum.inductiveautomation.com/nader.chinichian/32/9261_2.png) [@nader.chinichian](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/u/nader.chinichian)\
**Post date:** [June 26, 2020, 5:15pm UTC](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/document-format-vs-dataset-performance-for-tag-history-binding/36101/1 "2020-06-26T17:15:47Z")

</div>

Hi,  
As perspective table component can use both document format and dataset in tag history binding, which ones is recommended to use for better performance?
