# General Binding Efficiency Ranking

**URL:** <https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/general-binding-efficiency-ranking/67686>\
**Category:** Ignition\
**Tags:** perspective\
**Created:** [December 15, 2022, 5:59pm UTC](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/general-binding-efficiency-ranking/67686 "2022-12-15T17:59:19Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![paul-griffith](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/inductiveautomation/user_avatar/forum.inductiveautomation.com/paul-griffith/32/37249_2.png) [@paul-griffith](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/u/paul-griffith)\
**Post date:** [December 15, 2022, 10:12pm UTC](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/general-binding-efficiency-ranking/67686/3 "2022-12-15T22:12:14Z")

</div>

> [@j.israelsen](#):
>
> Also, for Perspective, where would the various transforms fall into the ranking (map, expression, script, etc.)?

Without actually doing the research to back it up: Format \> Map \> Expression \> Script, in terms of performance. Again, caveats as Phil noted, including the fact that map transforms can have expressions in the output.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/general-binding-efficiency-ranking/67686)._
