# GOOD\_OVERLOAD, should I ignore it?

**URL:** <https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/good-overload-should-i-ignore-it/109128>\
**Category:** Ignition\
**Tags:** ignition81\
**Created:** [July 30, 2025, 10:11am UTC](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/good-overload-should-i-ignore-it/109128 "2025-07-30T10:11:06Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![robertm](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/ea5d25/32.png) [@robertm](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/u/robertm)\
**Post date:** [July 30, 2025, 4:29pm UTC](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/good-overload-should-i-ignore-it/109128/4 "2025-07-30T16:29:17Z")

</div>

The ignored suggestion comes from IA.

> [@Ignition 8.1.5 OPC UA Client Good\_Overload Quality](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/ignition-8-1-5-opc-ua-client-good-overload-quality/46792):
>
> Hi, After upgrading to ignition 8.1.5 (from 8.0.14) i am getting the status Good\_Overload on all OPC points from a Simemens S7 1500 PLC with OPC UA protocol also the update rate of the tags is slowed down (3-5s) vs 1s configured, it was working fine with 8.0.14 any recommendations or configs that needto be changed on the OPC UA client-side (all the tags are configured as direct with 1000 ms subscription rate). S71500 OPC ServerDiag: [Server Diag] S71500 OPC ClientDiag: Good…

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/good-overload-should-i-ignore-it/109128)._