# Ignition OPC UA Client connection to Ignition OPC UA Server failed **URL:** \ **Category:** Ignition\ **Tags:** vision, ignition81\ **Created:** [January 13, 2022, 3:41am UTC](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/ignition-opc-ua-client-connection-to-ignition-opc-ua-server-failed/54955 "2022-01-13T03:41:24Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 5\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![witman](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/d2c977/32.png) [@witman](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/u/witman)\ **Post date:** [January 13, 2022, 3:41am UTC](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/ignition-opc-ua-client-connection-to-ignition-opc-ua-server-failed/54955/1 "2022-01-13T03:41:24Z")
I just got called for an "Ignition server down." It wasn't down, but may as well have been for production's purposes due to Ignition's OPC UA Client refusing to connect to Ignition's OPC UA Server. Error alternated between these two: > **UaException: status=Bad\_ConnectionClosed, message=connection closed** > > ```auto > at org.eclipse.milo.opcua.stack.client.transport.uasc.UascClientMessageHandler.channelInactive(UascClientMessageHandler.java:154) > at io.netty.channel.AbstractChannelHandlerContext.invokeChannelInactive(AbstractChannelHandlerContext.java:262) > at io.netty.channel.AbstractChannelHandlerContext.invokeChannelInactive(AbstractChannelHandlerContext.java:248) > at io.netty.channel.AbstractChannelHandlerContext.fireChannelInactive(AbstractChannelHandlerContext.java:241) > at io.netty.handler.codec.ByteToMessageDecoder.channelInputClosed(ByteToMessageDecoder.java:389) > at io.netty.handler.codec.ByteToMessageDecoder.channelInactive(ByteToMessageDecoder.java:354) > at io.netty.handler.codec.ByteToMessageCodec.channelInactive(ByteToMessageCodec.java:118) > at io.netty.channel.AbstractChannelHandlerContext.invokeChannelInactive(AbstractChannelHandlerContext.java:262) > at io.netty.channel.AbstractChannelHandlerContext.invokeChannelInactive(AbstractChannelHandlerContext.java:248) > at io.netty.channel.AbstractChannelHandlerContext.fireChannelInactive(AbstractChannelHandlerContext.java:241) > at io.netty.channel.DefaultChannelPipeline$HeadContext.channelInactive(DefaultChannelPipeline.java:1405) > at io.netty.channel.AbstractChannelHandlerContext.invokeChannelInactive(AbstractChannelHandlerContext.java:262) > at io.netty.channel.AbstractChannelHandlerContext.invokeChannelInactive(AbstractChannelHandlerContext.java:248) > at io.netty.channel.DefaultChannelPipeline.fireChannelInactive(DefaultChannelPipeline.java:901) > at io.netty.channel.AbstractChannel$AbstractUnsafe$8.run(AbstractChannel.java:819) > at io.netty.util.concurrent.AbstractEventExecutor.safeExecute(AbstractEventExecutor.java:164) > at io.netty.util.concurrent.SingleThreadEventExecutor.runAllTasks(SingleThreadEventExecutor.java:472) > at io.netty.channel.nio.NioEventLoop.run(NioEventLoop.java:497) > at io.netty.util.concurrent.SingleThreadEventExecutor$4.run(SingleThreadEventExecutor.java:989) > at io.netty.util.internal.ThreadExecutorMap$2.run(ThreadExecutorMap.java:74) > at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source) > 8.1.9 (b2021080617) > Azul Systems, Inc. 11.0.11 > > ``` > **UaException: status=Bad\_InternalError, message=unsupported protocol: null** > > ```auto > at org.eclipse.milo.opcua.stack.client.DiscoveryClient.getEndpoints(DiscoveryClient.java:189) > at com.inductiveautomation.ignition.gateway.opcua.client.ManagedClientKt.initialize(ManagedClient.kt:84) > at com.inductiveautomation.ignition.gateway.opcua.client.ManagedClient$create$1.invokeSuspend(ManagedClient.kt:63) > at com.inductiveautomation.ignition.gateway.opcua.client.ManagedClient$create$1.invoke(ManagedClient.kt) > at com.inductiveautomation.ignition.gateway.opcua.util.Managed$get$deferred$1.invokeSuspend(Managed.kt:40) > at kotlin.coroutines.jvm.internal.BaseContinuationImpl.resumeWith(ContinuationImpl.kt:33) > at kotlinx.coroutines.DispatchedTask.run(DispatchedTask.kt:106) > at kotlinx.coroutines.scheduling.CoroutineScheduler.runSafely(CoroutineScheduler.kt:571) > at kotlinx.coroutines.scheduling.CoroutineScheduler$Worker.executeTask(CoroutineScheduler.kt:738) > at kotlinx.coroutines.scheduling.CoroutineScheduler$Worker.runWorker(CoroutineScheduler.kt:678) > at kotlinx.coroutines.scheduling.CoroutineScheduler$Worker.run(CoroutineScheduler.kt:665) > 8.1.9 (b2021080617) > Azul Systems, Inc. 11.0.11 > > ``` Logs have a bunch of these: ![image](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/inductiveautomation/original/3X/d/c/dc63de0d8e40415e44c9f2a954188a4c17f3cd3e.jpeg) These two posts pointed me in the right direction (add "/discovery" to end of discovery url): > [@UascServerAsymmetricHandler Error when connecting to Ignition 8.1.2](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/uascserverasymmetrichandler-error-when-connecting-to-ignition-8-1-2/49430/2): > > When Ignition’s server is only configured with Basic256Sha256 SecurityPolicy then most clients will need to be configured with the “discovery” URL, which for Ignition is opc.tcp://hostname:62541/discovery. To get UaExpert connected you’ll need to be using the latest version (1.5.1) and use this discovery URL and the “custom discovery” option, not manually configure the endpoint details. Kepware’s client is broken and unable to connect unless the “None” SecurityPolicy option is also configured. … > [@Error installing security token](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/error-installing-security-token/35562/4): > > Okay, it’s what I suggested. By default Ignition’s OPC UA server only accepts secured connections at opc.tcp://10.122.220.204:62541. Unsecured discovery services can be found running at opc.tcp://10.122.220.204:62541/discovery. Some clients are defective and can’t handle this kind of setup. If that’s the case here, you change the configuration of Ignition’s server to allow None,Basic256Sha256 for its security policies (and restart) then this client will probably be able to connect. Thanks @Kevin.Herron! The failure was a little surprising as this Ignition server has been running 8.1.9 for months with no recent config changes and this problem popped up today. It also persisted through OPC UA module and gateway restarts. This is on a server upgraded through many versions since 7.9.x so config was as created in 7.9.x and upgraded by later version installers. ---
**Author:** ![witman](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/d2c977/32.png) [@witman](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/u/witman)\ **Post date:** [January 13, 2022, 4:09am UTC](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/ignition-opc-ua-client-connection-to-ignition-opc-ua-server-failed/54955/2 "2022-01-13T04:09:05Z")
If you’re updating this on a server that’s been upgraded from earlier versions and use the endpoint configuration wizard to add discovery to the discovery url, beware the wizard will automatically rename your server “Ignition OPC UA Server” (without the dash between OPC and UA like in older versions). If you don’t catch this and your server previously had the dash in this name, your tags will be broken due to an OPC server name mismatch. ---
**Author:** ![Kevin.Herron](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/inductiveautomation/user_avatar/forum.inductiveautomation.com/kevin.herron/32/7259_2.png) [@Kevin.Herron](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/u/Kevin.Herron)\ **Post date:** [January 13, 2022, 2:56pm UTC](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/ignition-opc-ua-client-connection-to-ignition-opc-ua-server-failed/54955/3 "2022-01-13T14:56:59Z")
I doubt this started happening “out of the blue”. Someone isn’t fessing up to changing a server setting or running through the endpoint discovery or something. Even if it wasn’t intentional. ---
**Author:** ![witman](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/d2c977/32.png) [@witman](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/u/witman)\ **Post date:** [January 13, 2022, 4:52pm UTC](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/ignition-opc-ua-client-connection-to-ignition-opc-ua-server-failed/54955/4 "2022-01-13T16:52:45Z")
Yes, the server was restarted before I got to it. I suspect something was changed weeks ago and only took effect with a server restart yesterday. I’m not sure why it was restarted, but it doesn’t look like this problem was recurring before that restart. One difference I noticed between this server and other servers that also lacked the “discovery” suffix on internal OPC UA server-client connection is this the None security policy was removed from this one (I’ve since removed it and added discovery suffix on all the others). If that change wouldn’t take effect till restart, I’m going to guess it was the root cause. ---
**Author:** ![Kevin.Herron](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/inductiveautomation/user_avatar/forum.inductiveautomation.com/kevin.herron/32/7259_2.png) [@Kevin.Herron](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/u/Kevin.Herron)\ **Post date:** [January 13, 2022, 4:59pm UTC](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/ignition-opc-ua-client-connection-to-ignition-opc-ua-server-failed/54955/5 "2022-01-13T16:59:07Z")
I think that’s what happened. If the None security policy is not in use the discovery URL must have the /discovery suffix because that will be the only unsecured endpoint left that discovery can be done at. Security policy changes don’t take effect until restart, so… sounds like what happened.