# Improve Ignition Device Throughput

**URL:** <https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/improve-ignition-device-throughput/107110>\
**Category:** Ignition\
**Created:** [June 5, 2025, 8:44pm UTC](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/improve-ignition-device-throughput/107110 "2025-06-05T20:44:05Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 6

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kevin.Herron](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/inductiveautomation/user_avatar/forum.inductiveautomation.com/kevin.herron/32/7259_2.png) [@Kevin.Herron](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/u/Kevin.Herron)\
**Post date:** [June 5, 2025, 8:58pm UTC](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/improve-ignition-device-throughput/107110/6 "2025-06-05T20:58:14Z")

</div>

The rabbit hole is deep: [Ignition & Logix Best Practice Tips for better communications](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/ignition-logix-best-practice-tips-for-better-communications/60386)

On an L8x the periodic tasks don't matter because communications has its own core.

What matters the most is that you're accessing tags co-located in the same UDTs, at the same rates, and avoiding the use of AOIs and other system types that can't be read efficiently.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/improve-ignition-device-throughput/107110)._
