# Improve Ignition Device Throughput

**URL:** <https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/improve-ignition-device-throughput/107110>\
**Category:** Ignition\
**Created:** [June 5, 2025, 8:44pm UTC](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/improve-ignition-device-throughput/107110 "2025-06-05T20:44:05Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 9

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![pturmel](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/inductiveautomation/user_avatar/forum.inductiveautomation.com/pturmel/32/3295_2.png) [@pturmel](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/u/pturmel)\
**Post date:** [June 5, 2025, 8:59pm UTC](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/improve-ignition-device-throughput/107110/9 "2025-06-05T20:59:58Z")

</div>

> [@Eric\_Li](#):
>
> using PlantPAx

Ewww! See this discussion after you finish with the rabbit hole linked above:

> [@Ignition & Rockwell PlantPAx v5.0](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/ignition-rockwell-plantpax-v5-0/94206):
>
> With Rockwell now including PlantPAx instructions as part of the native instruction set in their L8xP series controllers, there is no longer any ability to modify the instruction itself to optimize communications or modify read/write access to parameters. What is the current best practice, if any, going forward with PlantPAx and Ignition? Stay at version 4? Embed the v5 instruction in an Add-On-Instruction wrapper and optimize tags for communications? Are there any companies out there sell…

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/improve-ignition-device-throughput/107110)._