# Indirect Bidirectional Property Binding **URL:** \ **Category:** Ignition\ **Tags:** vision, ignition81\ **Created:** [April 24, 2024, 10:07pm UTC](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/indirect-bidirectional-property-binding/89412 "2024-04-24T22:07:57Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 3\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![amarks](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/inductiveautomation/user_avatar/forum.inductiveautomation.com/amarks/32/45610_2.png) [@amarks](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/u/amarks)\ **Post date:** [April 24, 2024, 10:07pm UTC](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/indirect-bidirectional-property-binding/89412/1 "2024-04-24T22:07:57Z")
I have a need to create an indirect bidirectional property binding and I'm wondering if that's possible. I have 3 properties on the root container of a template that are indirect bidirectional tag bindings. I want to be able to conditionally set one of these to then bidirectionally bind to a slider input. I know how I _could_ do it using a dynamic indirect bidirectional tag binding, but I'd rather keep my tag bindings to those internal properties rather than going directly to the tag. ---
**Author:** ![pturmel](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/inductiveautomation/user_avatar/forum.inductiveautomation.com/pturmel/32/3295_2.png) [@pturmel](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/u/pturmel)\ **Post date:** [April 24, 2024, 11:00pm UTC](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/indirect-bidirectional-property-binding/89412/2 "2024-04-24T23:00:08Z")
> [@amarks](#): > > wondering if that's possible. Nope, sorry. ---
**Author:** ![amarks](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/inductiveautomation/user_avatar/forum.inductiveautomation.com/amarks/32/45610_2.png) [@amarks](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/u/amarks)\ **Post date:** [April 25, 2024, 1:05pm UTC](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/indirect-bidirectional-property-binding/89412/3 "2024-04-25T13:05:39Z")
Alright, guess I'll dynamically create an internal string and use that in an indirect binding then...