# Named Queries VARCHAR Error **URL:** \ **Category:** Ignition\ **Created:** [May 13, 2024, 1:41pm UTC](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/named-queries-varchar-error/90307 "2024-05-13T13:41:08Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 24
**Author:** ![pturmel](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/inductiveautomation/user_avatar/forum.inductiveautomation.com/pturmel/32/3295_2.png) [@pturmel](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/u/pturmel)\ **Post date:** [May 14, 2024, 11:46am UTC](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/named-queries-varchar-error/90307/24 "2024-05-14T11:46:39Z")
> [@Transistor](#): > > fires off the script from the library and lets go. No. You might be confusing libraries with the technique I recommend in this topic: > [@Java concurrent queue for tag change scripts](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/java-concurrent-queue-for-tag-change-scripts/82044): > > Continuing the discussion from [[SOLVED] Are tag Value Changed scripts running asynchronously?](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/solved-are-tag-value-changed-scripts-running-asynchronously/68704/5): We've got code in our standard library that I need to log a value change on a tag and then associate various data points with that value change. The value is located in a UDT, and because this is part of our "standard" library we use for our customers, the number of tags is variable and quite possibly numerous so having a gateway tag event script isn't feasible for this solution. I was reading up on … Using `queueUtil` **does** push the work out of the tag event thread pool. --- _[View the full topic](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/named-queries-varchar-error/90307)._