# Question about large svgs in views

**URL:** <https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/question-about-large-svgs-in-views/49399>\
**Category:** Ignition\
**Created:** [July 30, 2021, 2:52pm UTC](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/question-about-large-svgs-in-views/49399 "2021-07-30T14:52:03Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![asher\_hounsell](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/8491ac/32.png) [@asher\_hounsell](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/u/asher_hounsell)\
**Post date:** [July 30, 2021, 2:52pm UTC](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/question-about-large-svgs-in-views/49399/1 "2021-07-30T14:52:03Z")

</div>

I have a relatively large svg (3 mb) with many other small svgs in a container on a view, and like google maps I am moving it around and zooming into it. In browser these actions can be a bit slow and choppy. I am quite new to this so I am wondering if someone with more experience would know if this is my browser/pc limitations or would it be limited by our gateway which I believe has 2 gb. Would increasing this increase performance significantly?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![paul-griffith](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/inductiveautomation/user_avatar/forum.inductiveautomation.com/paul-griffith/32/37249_2.png) [@paul-griffith](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/u/paul-griffith)\
**Post date:** [July 30, 2021, 3:07pm UTC](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/question-about-large-svgs-in-views/49399/2 "2021-07-30T15:07:52Z")

</div>

Most modern browsers have pretty good built-in developer tools that include the ability to profile performance.

I can almost guarantee that the problem is on the browser side, though; a ‘heavy’ SVG makes no difference to your gateway vs a ‘light’ one - but is significantly harder to actually draw and present, which is entirely handled by the browser.