# Question on Downtime analysis

**URL:** <https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/question-on-downtime-analysis/86945>\
**Category:** Ignition\
**Tags:** database\
**Created:** [March 6, 2024, 11:43pm UTC](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/question-on-downtime-analysis/86945 "2024-03-06T23:43:19Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Joshua\_Alfaro](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/dfb087/32.png) [@Joshua\_Alfaro](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/u/Joshua_Alfaro)\
**Post date:** [March 6, 2024, 11:43pm UTC](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/question-on-downtime-analysis/86945/1 "2024-03-06T23:43:19Z")

</div>

When I review the time in the downtime analysis, it gives one value, and in the report, it gives another for the same line and shift. I don't quite understand how the value in the DTU cell of the report is calculated; this is the time that seems unusual.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![pturmel](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/inductiveautomation/user_avatar/forum.inductiveautomation.com/pturmel/32/3295_2.png) [@pturmel](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/u/pturmel)\
**Post date:** [March 7, 2024, 12:51am UTC](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/question-on-downtime-analysis/86945/2 "2024-03-07T00:51:09Z")

</div>

Without a careful inspection of both, there's no way we can tell. Share more details. (Lots of details.)