# Running a client from a BeyondTrust Remote Support Representative Console?

**URL:** <https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/running-a-client-from-a-beyondtrust-remote-support-representative-console/39681>\
**Category:** Ignition\
**Tags:** ignition79\
**Created:** [October 14, 2020, 7:18pm UTC](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/running-a-client-from-a-beyondtrust-remote-support-representative-console/39681 "2020-10-14T19:18:12Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 8\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bkarabinchak.psi](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/inductiveautomation/user_avatar/forum.inductiveautomation.com/bkarabinchak.psi/32/83567_2.png) [@bkarabinchak.psi](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/u/bkarabinchak.psi)\
**Post date:** [October 14, 2020, 7:18pm UTC](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/running-a-client-from-a-beyondtrust-remote-support-representative-console/39681/1 "2020-10-14T19:18:13Z")

</div>

I have a customer who we set up with a Ignition 7.9.4 Gateway that only generally runs a single a client.

We recently were granted remote access to the server by the company via software called BeyondTrust Remote Support Representative Console. This allows a Teamviewer type of remoting in, a RDP style remoteing in, and VNC’ing in.

Is there a way with this software that I could remote in and then run a copy of the Vision client from my local computer (instead of through the actual teamviewer like instance)?

I know this is a very specific question and understand that it’s probably not something that is documented, but has anyone done this?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mmunin](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/c0e974/32.png) [@mmunin](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/u/mmunin)\
**Post date:** [August 26, 2021, 9:12pm UTC](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/running-a-client-from-a-beyondtrust-remote-support-representative-console/39681/2 "2021-08-26T21:12:47Z")

</div>

Sorry to revive this from the dead - but the vision client only needs HTTP connectivity on the gateway’s main port. If you set it up so you can hit the webpage, that same url can launch a client or designer session.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gopinath.ps](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/7ea924/32.png) [@gopinath.ps](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/u/gopinath.ps)\
**Post date:** [September 8, 2024, 2:57pm UTC](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/running-a-client-from-a-beyondtrust-remote-support-representative-console/39681/3 "2024-09-08T14:57:52Z")

</div>

Were you able to get this working? We have a similar requirement, but for perspective. Trying protocol tunneling, but it just wont work.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![pturmel](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/inductiveautomation/user_avatar/forum.inductiveautomation.com/pturmel/32/3295_2.png) [@pturmel](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/u/pturmel)\
**Post date:** [September 8, 2024, 3:17pm UTC](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/running-a-client-from-a-beyondtrust-remote-support-representative-console/39681/4 "2024-09-08T15:17:19Z")

</div>

To run a client, whether Vision or Perspective, from a remote environment, you need a **route** to the target **gateway**. VNC and RDP and other screen/keyboard access technologies, pointed at an internal **client** , do not provide a network route to the **gateway**.

You generally need a proper **VPN** solution to run clients from a remote environment.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![michael.flagler](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/inductiveautomation/user_avatar/forum.inductiveautomation.com/michael.flagler/32/26272_2.png) [@michael.flagler](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/u/michael.flagler)\
**Post date:** [September 8, 2024, 8:17pm UTC](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/running-a-client-from-a-beyondtrust-remote-support-representative-console/39681/5 "2024-09-08T20:17:48Z")

</div>

RustDesk provides tunnelling support, which I've gotten to work with other technologies, and I would guess it would also work with Ignition also, but haven't actually tried it yet. It's a TeamViewer alternative, but also allows direct IP connections. Although that won't help this particular instance with BeyondTrust, but it's about the only screen/keyboard/remote KVM style solution I've seen that does support tunneling traffic as well.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bkarabinchak.psi](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/inductiveautomation/user_avatar/forum.inductiveautomation.com/bkarabinchak.psi/32/83567_2.png) [@bkarabinchak.psi](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/u/bkarabinchak.psi)\
**Post date:** [September 9, 2024, 12:06pm UTC](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/running-a-client-from-a-beyondtrust-remote-support-representative-console/39681/6 "2024-09-09T12:06:27Z")

</div>

Not in the way I wanted originally where I could work off my laptop. I remote into the target server via BeyondTrust Remote Support and then work on it directly on there.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![amarks](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/inductiveautomation/user_avatar/forum.inductiveautomation.com/amarks/32/45610_2.png) [@amarks](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/u/amarks)\
**Post date:** [September 9, 2024, 1:52pm UTC](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/running-a-client-from-a-beyondtrust-remote-support-representative-console/39681/7 "2024-09-09T13:52:44Z")

</div>

We do this as well. We also have remote access to the site via a proper VPN, but the client's IT security is tight. They won't add the route or HTTP to the gateway for us. Routes are limited to the PLCs.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![michael.flagler](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/inductiveautomation/user_avatar/forum.inductiveautomation.com/michael.flagler/32/26272_2.png) [@michael.flagler](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/u/michael.flagler)\
**Post date:** [September 9, 2024, 2:37pm UTC](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/running-a-client-from-a-beyondtrust-remote-support-representative-console/39681/8 "2024-09-09T14:37:58Z")

</div>

What's funny about that is the direct access to the PLC from a security standpoint is more dangerous than access to the Ignition server.
