# SIMATIC NET OPC UA Server addressing

**URL:** <https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/simatic-net-opc-ua-server-addressing/87434>\
**Category:** Ignition\
**Created:** [March 16, 2024, 9:20pm UTC](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/simatic-net-opc-ua-server-addressing/87434 "2024-03-16T21:20:54Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 3\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![avantica](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/f0a364/32.png) [@avantica](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/u/avantica)\
**Post date:** [March 16, 2024, 9:20pm UTC](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/simatic-net-opc-ua-server-addressing/87434/1 "2024-03-16T21:20:54Z")

</div>

Hi all, I am trying to connect to some existing S7-300 via an existing SIMATIC NET OPC UA server using the Ignition OPC UA client.

I am following this guide [Siemens S7-300/SIMATIC NET OPC Addressing in Ignition | DMC, Inc.](https://www.dmcinfo.com/latest-thinking/blog/id/10192/siemens-s7-300simatic-net-opc-addressing-in-ignition) and it has worked for all of the data types but I am not sure how to address a string data type. Anyone have experience with this?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kevin.Herron](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/inductiveautomation/user_avatar/forum.inductiveautomation.com/kevin.herron/32/7259_2.png) [@Kevin.Herron](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/u/Kevin.Herron)\
**Post date:** [March 16, 2024, 9:30pm UTC](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/simatic-net-opc-ua-server-addressing/87434/2 "2024-03-16T21:30:00Z")

</div>

Doesn't the SIMATIC NET OPC UA server expose tags via browsing using their symbolic names?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![avantica](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/f0a364/32.png) [@avantica](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/u/avantica)\
**Post date:** [March 16, 2024, 9:53pm UTC](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/simatic-net-opc-ua-server-addressing/87434/3 "2024-03-16T21:53:12Z")

</div>

Yes that can be enabled but unfortunately this old PLC is using symbolic names with "." and can't be exposed so I have to use the direct addressing method like in the article.
