# "Starting up client project monitor" repeated log entries

**URL:** <https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/starting-up-client-project-monitor-repeated-log-entries/21691>\
**Category:** Ignition\
**Created:** [January 4, 2019, 4:37pm UTC](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/starting-up-client-project-monitor-repeated-log-entries/21691 "2019-01-04T16:37:29Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![brian.mcenulty](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/b77776/32.png) [@brian.mcenulty](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/u/brian.mcenulty)\
**Post date:** [January 4, 2019, 4:37pm UTC](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/starting-up-client-project-monitor-repeated-log-entries/21691/1 "2019-01-04T16:37:29Z")

</div>

I have a project running on version 7.9.9 that has many entries in the gateway’s diagnostic log for “Starting up client project monitor”. There are 4 of these entries that appear in 60 second intervals which seem to correspond to a client event timer script I’m running to check for inactivity to switch the logged in user (where there are 4 clients open). Is there any way to prevent these log entries? Below is the client event timer script that I’m using.

```auto
'''
Switch the Logged In User to the "user"
account after 60 minutes of inactivity
'''

timeoutSeconds = 3600
inactiveSeconds = system.util.getInactivitySeconds()

if inactiveSeconds >= timeoutSeconds:
	system.security.switchUser('user','pass')
else:
	pass

```

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Brian](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/97f17d/32.png) [@Brian](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/u/Brian)\
**Post date:** [January 4, 2019, 6:01pm UTC](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/starting-up-client-project-monitor-repeated-log-entries/21691/2 "2019-01-04T18:01:41Z")

</div>

I would add an additional check to see if the default user is already the one logged in. Right now, you are re-logging in the default user if it has been idle for your timeout period. I’m guessing that’s not exactly what you were wanting.