# Tag scan sampling rate **URL:** \ **Category:** Ignition\ **Tags:** vision, ignition81\ **Created:** [October 5, 2023, 5:06pm UTC](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/tag-scan-sampling-rate/80094 "2023-10-05T17:06:34Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 18
**Author:** ![pturmel](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/inductiveautomation/user_avatar/forum.inductiveautomation.com/pturmel/32/3295_2.png) [@pturmel](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/u/pturmel)\ **Post date:** [June 21, 2024, 11:13am UTC](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/tag-scan-sampling-rate/80094/18 "2024-06-21T11:13:41Z")
> [@robertm](#): > > individual PB tags Uhm, no. That would be even worse, as individual tags cannot be optimized at all. A few button booleans buried in another UDT is not really a problem. Just put them on the same subscription pace as the rest of the UDT. Have you read this other topic? > [@Ignition & Logix Best Practice Tips for better communications](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/ignition-logix-best-practice-tips-for-better-communications/60386): > > Hi All, After a whole bunch of issues I have gone down the rabbit hole of what is wrong with our setup on site. I will preface this by saying I a relatively new to all of this.... so be gentle stuck_out_tongue Based on much reading(such wow) I believe I have a list of things our site could take away for a better system. Some of them are easy to implement, whilst some of them need... significant work to realize. Especially the AOI approach in point 5 expressionless Before going too far a… Also: > [@robertm](#): > > But Ignition doesn’t handle bit of words very gracefully Simply not true, for device drivers that can perform read-modify-write atomics, and Logix certainly does. The logix driver simply doesn't make **drag and drop** convenient for booleans in integers, but you can certainly append the `.0` yourself. --- _[View the full topic](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/tag-scan-sampling-rate/80094)._