# The NEW Next Driver Poll

**URL:** <https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/the-new-next-driver-poll/3242>\
**Category:** Ignition\
**Created:** [September 1, 2011, 8:56pm UTC](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/the-new-next-driver-poll/3242 "2011-09-01T20:56:48Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kyle\_Chase](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/9de0a6/32.png) [@Kyle\_Chase](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/u/Kyle_Chase)\
**Post date:** [August 31, 2012, 6:11pm UTC](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/the-new-next-driver-poll/3242/21 "2012-08-31T18:11:51Z")

</div>

We are currently working on this driver. ETA of roughly 2 months.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gnguyen](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/41988e/32.png) [@gnguyen](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/u/gnguyen)\
**Post date:** [August 31, 2012, 6:23pm UTC](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/the-new-next-driver-poll/3242/22 "2012-08-31T18:23:12Z")

</div>

Wow. Great to read. We should be abble to make the customer wait for this.  
First for beta. We have great specific MIB to try !

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![NetNathan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/54ee81/32.png) [@NetNathan](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/u/NetNathan)\
**Post date:** [December 9, 2012, 4:37am UTC](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/the-new-next-driver-poll/3242/23 "2012-12-09T04:37:14Z")

</div>

GE-SRTP  
Ethernet for GE PLCs.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kevin.Herron](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/inductiveautomation/user_avatar/forum.inductiveautomation.com/kevin.herron/32/7259_2.png) [@Kevin.Herron](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/u/Kevin.Herron)\
**Post date:** [December 10, 2012, 4:25pm UTC](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/the-new-next-driver-poll/3242/24 "2012-12-10T16:25:37Z")

</div>

[quote=“NetNathan”]GE-SRTP  
Ethernet for GE PLCs.[/quote]

Too bad SRTP is proprietary, it would make things a lot easier (and likely to happen) otherwise ☹

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![NetNathan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/54ee81/32.png) [@NetNathan](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/u/NetNathan)\
**Post date:** [December 20, 2012, 9:37am UTC](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/the-new-next-driver-poll/3242/25 "2012-12-20T09:37:04Z")

</div>

[quote=“Kevin.Herron”][quote=“NetNathan”]GE-SRTP  
Ethernet for GE PLCs.[/quote]

Too bad SRTP is proprietary, it would make things a lot easier (and likely to happen) otherwise ☹[/quote]

Sorry I missed your reply.  
If this is true…How do TopServer and Matrikon do it??

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kevin.Herron](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/inductiveautomation/user_avatar/forum.inductiveautomation.com/kevin.herron/32/7259_2.png) [@Kevin.Herron](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/u/Kevin.Herron)\
**Post date:** [December 20, 2012, 1:26pm UTC](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/the-new-next-driver-poll/3242/26 "2012-12-20T13:26:27Z")

</div>

[quote=“NetNathan”][quote=“Kevin.Herron”][quote=“NetNathan”]GE-SRTP  
Ethernet for GE PLCs.[/quote]

Too bad SRTP is proprietary, it would make things a lot easier (and likely to happen) otherwise ☹[/quote]

Sorry I missed your reply.  
If this is true…How do TopServer and Matrikon do it??[/quote]

Reverse-engineering or shady back room deals ![:thumb_right:](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/inductiveautomation/original/1X/2026e28c0c425034352c1b75807edf956adc75f4.gif ":thumb\_right:")

Same way they do Allen-Bradley… And most other drivers with no public specification.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Henry](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/df705f/32.png) [@Henry](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/u/Henry)\
**Post date:** [January 18, 2013, 3:59pm UTC](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/the-new-next-driver-poll/3242/27 "2013-01-18T15:59:50Z")

</div>

How about a Modbus serial driver.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![profadi2](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/2bfe46/32.png) [@profadi2](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/u/profadi2)\
**Post date:** [February 13, 2013, 11:39am UTC](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/the-new-next-driver-poll/3242/28 "2013-02-13T11:39:25Z")

</div>

I Think IEC 61850 would be the best option for now and future business.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gnguyen](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/41988e/32.png) [@gnguyen](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/u/gnguyen)\
**Post date:** [February 13, 2013, 11:44am UTC](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/the-new-next-driver-poll/3242/29 "2013-02-13T11:44:43Z")

</div>

Hi,

I think that in nowadays “energy efficiency” focus on all activities (industry, building, tansportation…), BACnet should be a good option too.  
Beside this, the object and service orientation of BACnet would be a great match with Ignition UDT/Templating…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jose.granero](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/inductiveautomation/user_avatar/forum.inductiveautomation.com/jose.granero/32/11190_2.png) [@jose.granero](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/u/jose.granero)\
**Post date:** [March 24, 2013, 7:36pm UTC](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/the-new-next-driver-poll/3242/30 "2013-03-24T19:36:26Z")

</div>

IEC61850 should be added

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jamess](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/87869e/32.png) [@jamess](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/u/jamess)\
**Post date:** [April 18, 2013, 9:38pm UTC](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/the-new-next-driver-poll/3242/31 "2013-04-18T21:38:54Z")

</div>

K-Sequence

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![thierryv](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/a8b319/32.png) [@thierryv](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/u/thierryv)\
**Post date:** [July 8, 2013, 9:34pm UTC](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/the-new-next-driver-poll/3242/32 "2013-07-08T21:34:07Z")

</div>

A first vote for a Beckhoff driver.  
Beckhoff uses a open protocol so that can be no problem for the Inductive team 😉

Any updates regarding the SNMP driver?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![zxcslo](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/inductiveautomation/user_avatar/forum.inductiveautomation.com/zxcslo/32/61610_2.png) [@zxcslo](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/u/zxcslo)\
**Post date:** [August 5, 2013, 5:36pm UTC](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/the-new-next-driver-poll/3242/33 "2013-08-05T17:36:54Z")

</div>

Passive TCP driver. Or an option to choose between active/passive connection in TCP driver.

I have a handheld WLAN scanner IDM140WLAN from SICK, which I can’t use (I have just been on phone with the support), because scanner is also making active connection.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![blakekinder](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/e0b2c6/32.png) [@blakekinder](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/u/blakekinder)\
**Post date:** [September 30, 2013, 8:47pm UTC](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/the-new-next-driver-poll/3242/34 "2013-09-30T20:47:09Z")

</div>

My vote would be for Opto22 or Beckoff.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![d.laquidain](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/90ced4/32.png) [@d.laquidain](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/u/d.laquidain)\
**Post date:** [January 16, 2014, 5:47pm UTC](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/the-new-next-driver-poll/3242/35 "2014-01-16T17:47:37Z")

</div>

An ADS driver for beckhoff would be great.

Beckhoff has a java api which you can develop your own driver.

Here are examples of that.

[infosys.beckhoff.com/italiano.ph … ro.htm&id=](http://infosys.beckhoff.com/italiano.php?content=../content/1040/TcAdsComLib/HTML/TcAdsComLib_Intro.htm&id=)

Regards.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![nmudge](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/inductiveautomation/user_avatar/forum.inductiveautomation.com/nmudge/32/3394_2.png) [@nmudge](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/u/nmudge)\
**Post date:** [January 16, 2014, 9:22pm UTC](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/the-new-next-driver-poll/3242/36 "2014-01-16T21:22:17Z")

</div>

Kymera Systems Inc has an SNMP Driver available for Ignition: [marketplace.inductiveautomation. … oduleId=78](http://marketplace.inductiveautomation.com/moduledetail?4&moduleId=78)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BSH](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/c68b51/32.png) [@BSH](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/u/BSH)\
**Post date:** [March 11, 2014, 10:54am UTC](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/the-new-next-driver-poll/3242/37 "2014-03-11T10:54:53Z")

</div>

Can we get an update on what’s happening on the development front for drivers, any drivers in the pipeline to be rolled out in next version of Ignition?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kevin.Herron](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/inductiveautomation/user_avatar/forum.inductiveautomation.com/kevin.herron/32/7259_2.png) [@Kevin.Herron](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/u/Kevin.Herron)\
**Post date:** [March 11, 2014, 1:18pm UTC](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/the-new-next-driver-poll/3242/38 "2014-03-11T13:18:28Z")

</div>

Ignition 7.7 will include a new Logix driver that works with v21 firmware (as well as older firmwares). There’s no other drivers in active development right now.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BSH](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/c68b51/32.png) [@BSH](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/u/BSH)\
**Post date:** [March 11, 2014, 6:14pm UTC](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/the-new-next-driver-poll/3242/39 "2014-03-11T18:14:28Z")

</div>

Thanks for the update Kevin.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Javachon](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/ac8455/32.png) [@Javachon](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/u/Javachon)\
**Post date:** [April 14, 2014, 5:47pm UTC](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/the-new-next-driver-poll/3242/40 "2014-04-14T17:47:46Z")

</div>

DNP3 is a must for Ignition to be used in electric utilities. I would really like to see a DNP3 driver.

[Previous page](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/the-new-next-driver-poll/3242.md?page=1)

[Next page](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/the-new-next-driver-poll/3242.md?page=3)
