# UDTs in Tag Driving Provider

**URL:** <https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/udts-in-tag-driving-provider/10480>\
**Category:** General Discussion\
**Created:** [September 17, 2015, 2:51pm UTC](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/udts-in-tag-driving-provider/10480 "2015-09-17T14:51:27Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![joaopmrod2](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/90ced4/32.png) [@joaopmrod2](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/u/joaopmrod2)\
**Post date:** [September 17, 2015, 2:51pm UTC](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/udts-in-tag-driving-provider/10480/1 "2015-09-17T14:51:27Z")

</div>

Can’t I use UDTs in a Tag Driving Provider?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Colby.Clegg](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/inductiveautomation/user_avatar/forum.inductiveautomation.com/colby.clegg/32/3282_2.png) [@Colby.Clegg](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/u/Colby.Clegg)\
**Post date:** [September 24, 2015, 8:52pm UTC](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/udts-in-tag-driving-provider/10480/2 "2015-09-24T20:52:50Z")

</div>

No, unfortunately they cannot. It certainly has been requested a number of times, but I don’t think it will likely happen, at least in the current form of external tags.

What we will likely do is tweak the format just a bit to have a more “hybrid” approach, where the udt/tags are defined internally, but their values are published through the db. This would achieve the main result of sharing tags through the database, but would be a little different than how it currently works.

Regards,
