# Why are there no Device Diagnostic Tags for devices implemented with the DNP3 Driver?

**URL:** <https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/why-are-there-no-device-diagnostic-tags-for-devices-implemented-with-the-dnp3-driver/66875>\
**Category:** Ignition\
**Tags:** ignition81\
**Created:** [November 24, 2022, 12:24am UTC](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/why-are-there-no-device-diagnostic-tags-for-devices-implemented-with-the-dnp3-driver/66875 "2022-11-24T00:24:39Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kevin.Herron](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/inductiveautomation/user_avatar/forum.inductiveautomation.com/kevin.herron/32/7259_2.png) [@Kevin.Herron](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/u/Kevin.Herron)\
**Post date:** [November 24, 2022, 1:38am UTC](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/why-are-there-no-device-diagnostic-tags-for-devices-implemented-with-the-dnp3-driver/66875/2 "2022-11-24T01:38:49Z")

</div>

Hmm, seems like an omission, it should at least have the basic Connected, Hostname, etc… tags.

It won’t ever have the “Sampling” tags because it’s not supposed to be polling/sampling-based like more traditional drivers (even if it does act that way in some ways right now…).

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.inductiveautomation.com/t/why-are-there-no-device-diagnostic-tags-for-devices-implemented-with-the-dnp3-driver/66875)._
