I don't think I am smart enough.
I am also not sure how the autogen that would check the work would be implemented.
I think I would need a whole forum of autogen experts, a great documentation set like Ignition has along with the 50 hours plus of training videos, and a paid support line for live help.
Thanks for sharing this, this is so cool
Here's an inspirational quote that is intended to dissuade this line of reasoning:
'Whether you think you can, or you think you can't--you're right" ~ Henry Ford
Henry Ford's statement is wrong, and I know that for sure because I thought I could some things I couldn't. lol But thanks
It means (or at least thatâs how I interpret it) that if you think you canât, you wonât even try, and if you donât try, you for sure canât do it.
Wether you actually succeed if you do try is almost irrelevant. I donât remember who said âI didnât fail to make it work, I merely found a thousand ways it doesnâtâ.
Or something like that.
Regarding Ignition, I think " pturmel " is better than ChatGPT
At the rate that autogen teams are being developed per Mathew Berman's videos, maybe I will be able to automate some JSON soon personally.
I would imagine the new LLMs are working much better?
I read somewhere things are slowing down because everyone is (trying) to block (free) access to their data.
Censorship also been quite the focus...
Altho it seems some improvments were made in the o1 model for coding and math. but dont think this one is free to use, so cant tell you if its any better
I was a little alarmed at the pace of Manus the other day, but then it seemed like it was very API driven with some webpage generation.
Hard to tell what is cutting edge, and what is just fake.
Still watching what Alex is doing.
Today I wanted to batch create a few hundred getBit expression UDT members to parse out bitmapped alarms from DNP3 counter objects... String encoding the JSON, escaping all the "s, building a giant concatenation, and reversing the process with the output ended up saving me time vs ChatGPT with output that was easier to test. When Excel can get the job done, sometimes you need to be a freak in the sheets.
When I started reading your post, that's where my brain went before I even got to your mention of it. I still use excel for quickly assembling stuff like this because I know there won't be any unexpectedness in the output.