I’m on 8.1.37 As I’ve written this, I think I solved my original question of why this behavior happens, but I’ll leave this here to provide some context. I’ve got some custom properties on a view that handle the information for the components on the view. ▶ Custom Properties The dataGettingObj has …

I would ditch all of those properties and timestamps and booleans. Make your query (named query?) include the line value in each row. Ignore or hide it downstream if not needed. Bind your NQ to view.custom.data with view.custom.line as a parameter, and your 10-second polling. Keep your existing …

I could move the query binding to a script that gets ran with the parameters at the moment, so that I could pull it into a script instead, so that it doesn’t auto-refresh when the parameter changes, and instead synchronously runs on the script after setting the loadTime and such. Doesn’t entirely fe…

Sometimes you just have to force the order of events to prevent races.

That would make sense. Originally, I was having troubles even tracking where the race was, which is why I started the post. Something, something, rubber duck and such. I know it’s pretty much completely not feasible, but it’d be nice to have something that visualized the process flow that Ignition …

You know, I think I used a similar format for a project like a year ago, and I have no idea why I didn’t just go with that format. Each row containing redundant info feels bad for keeping the table data limited, but it’s never more than 1000 rows anyway, so it definitely doesn’t concern me that much …

Do make sure your View Custom properties are set to private, to avoid unnecessary browser traffic. Finding yourself dealing with racy scripts is a hint that you shouldn't be using scripts. Scripts should be a last resort when tag bindings, property bindings, and expression bindings cannot solve yo…

Yeah, I would love to use your integration toolkit, but management is pretty much only comfortable with the first party modules. I’ve tried to push for this as the quirks (intended mechanics that management doesn’t understand) of Ignition keep rearing their ugly head, but they are willing to just th…

[image] Xander_Dawson-Fink: throw my time (to find work arounds or better practices) at it instead Have you started writing your own modules with the SDK? My Integration Toolkit's 2023 expansion was entirely due to my frustrations with Perspective's unfixably poor performance. Unfixable, th…

[image] Xander_Dawson-Fink: but management is pretty much only comfortable with the first party modules. I should link this: [image] Automation Professionals' Integration Toolkit Module 3rd Party Modules Sorry. This module exists, and is NOT open sourc…

Oh yeah, I’ve looked at it and would love to integrate it, as it’s really great work. Currently trying to get my direct manager to build a business case for it (as free is even too expensive right now). I think there’d be tons of man hours saved in just not reworking a problem 20 times over. We’ll s…

Bidirectional Bindings

Ignition

pturmel December 29, 2025, 4:22pm 10

I should link this: