It seems to be working for the most part, but I am having some performance issues. I found an article here that says that referring to UDTs directly are heavy. This template is doing just that, extracting multiple fields from a UDT that it took as a parameter (of the UDT data type). This window has been slow and demands a lot of client-side CPU. Now the template itself demands more CPU than reasonable. Unless I have done other things wrong this appears to be the root of the performance problems unless someone can provide input that UDT references have been optimized. Is passing the string path and then gathering the required data using system.tag.readAll() still the recommended method?
1 Like