For a Site Historian requirement, I am exploring the historians available in the market and understanding where each Historian fits well. Can anyone throw light on the following questions?
Ignition vs. Canary
Q: Under what circumstances would an Ignition customer choose Canary as the target historian or embed Canary’s charts/applications into Ignition Designer?. I see that Ignition has its Historian, asset modeling through partner modules, and two visualization systems.
Q: Does Ignition also directly compete with Canary?
Ignition vs. OSI PI
Q: Are there any significant advantages in choosing Ignition over OSI PI? (OSI PI has 400+ interfaces, Historian, asset framework, and visualization)
Ignition vs. AWS
Q: With Greengrass, Timestream, and SiteWise, AWS offers robust connectivity, Historian, asset modeling, and visualization. With AWS Outposts, they can also be a Site Historian (apart from being a Cloud Historian). What are the use-cases where one would prefer Ignition over AWS, and what are the unique advantages?