Ignition Re-Certification & Expiring Certifications 2025

This is going to serve as the main thread for posts of this nature and we will close/merge similar questions into this.

Background
A long long time ago (2.5 years) the Certification system for Ignition was changed to no longer be based on version and to last three years. Certificates are "Core" or "Gold" without a version number attached. This means that any Core or Gold Certification someone has, expires at a certain date.

View Your Cert Expiration Date
You can view your Certificate Expiration date on your IA Account:
account.inductiveautomation.com/tests
The earliest expiration dates are in November 2025.

How to Recertify?
Likely the fastest way is to take the equivalent Certification Test to recertify, or take the next level test if you are prepared.

Acquire the test before your Certification expires, and you will be able to complete it even if the expiration occurs while taking the test.

Completing Gold counts as/resets Core as well, aka you only need to recertify at the highest level.

What if the website is not letting me start a test?
Common reasons you may be unable to start a test include: having a test already in progress, or a website email not being linked correctly. Email training@inductiveautomation.com to verify the status of access for your test/account.

More info on tests?
The links above have all of the info about tests including practice tests. The updated Gold questions are reflected in the currently available Gold practice test :cow: :factory:.

3 Likes

The Gold Test is now available for purchase online.

4 Likes

I was running through the practice test for Gold and think there may be an issue with the simulator CSV. I believe it's missing the HOA tag for Packaging 3 (the others have this tag, but #3 doesn't, so the UDT has an error when you create it for this instance/line.

2 Likes

Thanks Michael you're right I see that's missing from Palletizer 3, that file will be updated later today.

Some other comments on the practice/study guide.

  • Reporting for Motors - I couldn't figure this one out. I've done reports several times, but nothing like this. Could get the list of motors with HOA value of 1 using a script datasource, and can get historical data the same way for this limited list of motors, but couldn't find a way to script nested datasets. Maybe I'm going about it all wrong, but since the timeseries chart won't let you set a dynamic data key, I couldn't get it to work.
  • Reporting for Orders - This calls for generating a report for the last 7 days or any time range, but the problem is that the report it wants you to run is for incomplete orders which don't have a date set, so there's no way to filter unless you add a column for when the order was created.
1 Like

Psssst!

I'll have to give this a shot, but for a gold certification practice test, it shouldn't be required to do that much of a deep dive. My guess is that the intent is to create a database with the tags listed (I believe the old gold test had a table with all the motors listed in it) that you can then do a nested query with, but in my opinion, that's not truly dynamic since adding a motor to the tags also requires adding a motor to the database. But maybe that is the intent (to update the database with new motors as they're added?)

1 Like

FWIW, I'm not planning to change my non-certified status.

3 Likes

Thanks Michael. My colleagues or I will look into these and update the text as appropriate. From what I recall...

I agree that the practice motor report requires some digging, but our goal is typically only ever to have you look at the UM, I will do some more research about how well it is documented. FWIW the actual test doesn't have precisely this task, the reporting tasks it has are more easy to find in the UM from our testing. And yes the idea is that new tags would be dynamically available, creating the instance would include history being on to start logging.

And yes good catch there is some text that should be removed ", and to use the last 7 days of data. " is not meant to be there it contradicts the goal of that report which is is meant to pull all incomplete orders. (This fictional org isn't great with their data they never saw the value in having start dates on their orders...)

1 Like

I've gone ahead and started the official gold test re-certification, and my initial reaction to the gwbk file was....why is it so large. It's over 60MB and it looks like there's a lot of extra files in the user-lib/pylib folder like numpy and other things that are making the backup extra bloated. Is this extra stuff in there from testing or used for grading it automatically, or could these files be made smaller and lighter? (I have large projects with ~100k tags and many more screens that only use ~15-20MB of space).

Just an observation, but just thought I'd give my opinion on it.

2 Likes

Good to know, the GWBK is fairly standard. For comparison the previous Gold test troubleshooting backup provided was ~5-6 MB more than that. There was nothing done to increase or decrease its size yet, but we can look into cleaning it up.

--
The other issues from this thread are resolved, if anyone ever has a question, comment, concern, etc. on Training material feel free to email training@inductiveautomation.com.

*For docs feedback their email is docs@inductiveautomation.com