Do you want to programmatically define a binding ?
If that's what you want to do, then you'd better use indirect tag bindings instead. That's what they're for.
If that's not what you mean, can you try reformulating or giving more details about what you want to do ?
I think you mean you can do it, but you have to edit the underlying file to do it. That's still editing it programmatically though however I won't update straight away, and you may need to refresh the page to receive it in a client (i haven't tested that) . However it's a terrible idea to actually do that. Whatever the outcome required is, it can likely be done in a standard manner
It looks like this could just use an indirect binding, as @pascal.fragnoud said, using props.params.FixeTag and UDTTag.. Unless I'm missing something? That's all the existing direct tag binding is made up of at the moment
You are technically correct, the best kind of correct.
What I meant is that a view cannot define/edit bindings itself in a session, e.g. a custom prop change script editing/creating a binding on another prop.
I do a view as my faceplate template and I use expression binding my params.
I have to lots of revisions tag now,so I haven't meny time can revisions my faceplate template again.
I don't mean to be rude, but I'm struggling to understand what you said. If English isn't your first language, are you able to use google translate to translate from your native language?
I make a perspective view do my equipment faceplate.
and then I create a new perspective view.
I use a lot of equipment faceplate in my new perspective view.
but my indirect tag binding is setting in equipment faceplate.
So I will setting my equipment faceplate binding tag from step by step.
If I'm understanding correctly, use indirect bindings. Pass the tag path as a parameter to your view, and use that parameter as a component of the indirect tag binding.