Hi,
I have two tables in my report. Table A and Table B.
If anyone one of the table is not getting accumulated on current page then it will continue with the next page. But when anyone table gets on the second page, The table which was finished at page 1 also gets repeated on every page .
If the table is finished on a page I do not want it to be get repeated on next page. That space should remail blank
Pls let me know what to do
You have to put both tables in a table group. The table group will then span the pages as you wish.
I have to do something like : two tables side by side and the third table just below both of this two tables.
like first the above two tables should be polulated completely only then the thrid table below should start.
I kno to use Table group (Peer) for the third table to get popilated just after the above table finishes but was stuck why the table which is completely polulated on the page 1 is getting repeated on the next pages
Huh. Never had to do that. Not sure it can be done while also spanning pages. 
The thing is I have to print out the whole page visibile in the browser.
I tried using component event - RequestPrint. But that thing is only printing the things which are currently visible on the screen and not printing the whole page.
Even tried playing with the "Page","View" and "component" optings which are available for the Request print event
That is totally unrelated to Reporting.
Please explain what you really need to do.
Client requirement is that he wants to print all the things as it looks like on the view
So I Decided to make a report which looks like it which can be downloaded and later printed.
If there’s another way to achieve the outcome pls let me know
Is there a size limit to T1 and T2? Can you guarantee that T1 and T2 will not be longer than 1 page, for example?
No T1 and T2 size are not fixed.
In mostly T2 will be larger than T1 and may spill out to second page
I don't recommend this approach; I haven't tried it, and I'm not even 100% sure it will work. This is just a fun exercise because I got nerd-sniped. Except under extreme duress, I would not do this. I would try to convince my customer to accept a report with a format more aligned with the reporting module's paradigm. Now that you've been warned...
There are two ways that you maybe could do this.
Gather your data for T1 and T2 from two different sources and use a script data source to combine them into three different tables we'll call T1-2', T1', and T2'.
T1-2' would have as many rows as the shorter of T1 and T2. It will have the same number of columns as T1 + T2, and every cell will have a value.T1 or T2:
T1 to T1' or from T2 to T2'
T1' or T2' will have zero rows by definition.Combine T1-2', T1', T2', and T3 into one table group. This will control the vertical wrapping.
Other settings/concepts you'll need to tweak to get the formatting right:
T1 and T2).T1' or T2'.
T1-2' which has its own headings at the top of the page.T1-2' will be exactly one page long, and you'll want the headings on either T1' or T2'T1-2', T1', and T2'. Both of these will be a pain to setup and an even bigger pain to maintain if changes are eventually made to the report.
T1-2' with T1', and T2'.T1-2' are the same as their respective columns in T1' and T2'Gather your data for T1 and T2 from two different sources and use a script data source to combine them into one table, T1-2'.
T1-2' has the same number of columns as T1 + T2.T1-2' will have the same number of rows as the greater of T1 and T2.T1 or T2 has no more remaining rows, the cell values in T1-2' for the exhausted table would be NULL.As before, combine T1-2' and T3 in a table group.
Formatting considerations:
T1 and T2 reprint on every page where there is data and not reprint when there isn't data. This is the downside of this method. You could prevent heading reprinting altogether which may be acceptable to you.Ok will give this a try and let you know the outcome
It worked.
Wrote a script to merge both the datasets and formatted the table as per the need.
Thanks!